After reading the Aegis case study from our textbook, respond to the following prompts in one to five sentences: Based on the information in the case (and as of the case’s date, 2003) Do you think the strategic alliances with Honeywell & Rockwell were chosen well (evaluate each individually) and explain why or why not? This necessitates evaluating the appeal of substitutes to strategic alliances. Do you think the SA’s with Honeywell & Rockwell were implemented well (evaluate each individually and explain why or why not)? Consider Aegis’s overall approach, the particulars of each agreement and the mechanisms for creating value in a strategic alliance (as described in our textbook). Evaluate the contract terms for the strategic alliances that the case describes. Were they well drawn to: Ensure that the financial interests of Aegis its partners will align? Ensure that the alliances will effectively pursue Aegis’ strategic goals for forming the alliances? Is there anything missing in the specified terms of each agreement (see the case’s description of contract terms) that could generate fiction between Aegis & its partners in the future (see Table 11.5) The following content is partner provid